Skip to content
Archive of entries posted on January 2009

#6: Downtown Department Store

This is not a new idea with me, of course. I’m just repeating here the mantra of change we’ve heard from so many urban Denverites for many years now: we need a Downtown Denver department store.

We used to have in Downtown a May D&F, J.C. Penney, Joslins, the Denver, and perhaps a few other retailers that would qualify as department stores as we’ve traditionally known them. They are now all gone from Downtown. In return, we have Cherry Creek, a phenomenal retail district that is in the upper echelon of urban retail centers in the United States. But given the proximity of Cherry Creek to Downtown, it is unlikely that we will see a traditional department store in Downtown any time soon.

However, department stores that take the form of a mass merchandiser like Target—that’s another story. In fact, I’d rather see a Target in Downtown Denver than a Macy’s or whatever anyway, since Target sells a far greater range of household and personal goods than a Macy’s or a Penneys. As I mentioned in my post on streetcars, approximately 205,000 people, including me, live within a three-mile radius of the intersection of Broadway and Colfax, yet in order to go to the closest Target, we all have to go to Glendale or to Edgewater—different municipalities! That’s just not right. There is the Kmart on South Broadway, but that’s almost three miles from Downtown and I’m not a big fan of Kmart anyway.

You may recall that a developer once had plans for an urban Target on Block 162, but the deal fell through because the developer couldn’t assemble the land. Since then, I’ve heard a few rumors about a possible urban Target in Downtown Denver here or there, but so far they’ve never amounted to anything. I’ve also heard that Target Corporation itself has Denver at the top of its list for an urban store, but Target doesn’t develop their own stores; we need a local developer to take on the challenge of finding the right site and getting the project built—then Target will come.

Any Downtown Target should have, to maximize the utility of the land, some kind of tower above it, whether it’s housing or office or whatever. That will further complicate putting the deal together for the developer, but it’s the right thing to do in the long run. A Target in Downtown Denver should be located within a block or so of the 16th Street Mall to allow for Downtown workers and residents to get to it conveniently via the mall shuttle. A Target would certainly have underground or structured parking, but it should be located as close to public transit as possible.

Finally, I bet a bunch of you out there are going to post a comment to this blog saying we need a Downtown grocery store too. Hold your horses… you’ll get your chance in #5.


#7: Downtown Streetcars!

Everyone is certainly aware of FasTracks, metro Denver’s rail transit expansion program approved by voters in 2004 that will add 119 miles to our existing 35-mile rail system and position Denver as one of the nation’s leading cities in public transport. Based on a hub-and-spoke model, RTD’s post-FasTracks rail system will be well suited to shuttle passengers back and forth from Downtown Denver to the city’s outlying suburbs, DIA, and Boulder. It’s necessary, and I’m happy we’re doing it.

But, the time has come for Denver to invest in rail transit for its urban core. RTD’s post-FasTracks system will provide minimal utility to the 205,000 people who live within a three-mile radius of Downtown. Much of the RTD system runs along freight rail corridors and through industrial areas, not where Denver’s urban core population resides. Denver’s center city is well-served by bus routes, but busses can get stuck in traffic or stuck in snow, and they don’t provide the same quality transit experience that can be provided by streetcars. Because of the permanent infrastructure of streetcars versus the transiency of a bus line, streetcars can also stimulate economic development activity to a far greater degree than can bus routes. Streetcars are also more conducive to denser urban environments as they typically share a travel lane with vehicular traffic, as opposed to light rail, which typically runs in its own right-of-way. Here’s an example of a streetcar line in Portland, Oregon:

Denver once had one of the most extensive streetcar networks in the country. Denver’s system, which first started in the 1870s as horse-drawn streetcars, evolved into a fully electrified system that provided service to virtually every developed neighborhood in the city by the 1920s and 1930s. Of course, you can probably guess the rest of the story: by the 1940s we started replacing the streetcars with busses and, in June 1950, the last streetcar made its final run in Denver.

Just how extensive was Denver’s streetcar system? Using the Denver Tramway Company streetcar route map included in Robertson’s and Cafky’s tremendous Denver’s Street Railways, Volume II book (published in 2004 by Sundance Publications) as my guide, I’ve created this exhibit showing Denver’s streetcar system as it existed in 1926 (about when the system was at its peak) overlaid on top of a current Denver aerial:

Incredible, huh? Plus, what’s not shown on the map are the “inter-urban” lines that ran to Arvada and Golden.

If you look closely, you can still find evidence of Denver’s streetcar system today as, in a number of locations, the rails were simply paved over and are sometimes visible through the asphalt, like this shot I took a few years ago at 14th and Delaware (I think it’s been paved over since):

So, what we should do is begin laying the foundation for a return to a streetcar system that serves Denver’s urban core districts by creating a Downtown streetcar loop from which additional streetcar lines could eventually radiate to places like Cherry Creek, Highland, Curtis Park, South Broadway, and elsewhere. Converting the proposed Downtown Circulator, which is planned as a mall-shuttle type bus that would travel between Union Station and Civic Center via 18th, 19th, Broadway, and Lincoln, to streetcars would be a good place to start. And like in Portland, our Downtown streetcar loop, along with the 16th Street Mall shuttle—also a potential streetcar conversion opportunity—should be part of a “fareless square” that enables free transit within the Downtown core.

Debating the alignment of the streetcar loop and subsequent extensions is the fun part; getting our first starter line in place will be the challenge. I’m convinced that RTD and suburban voters will not be in the mood to fund a Denver-centric streetcar system anytime soon. Consequently, if an urban core streetcar system is something Denver citizens want, then we’re going to have to pay for it ourselves. A couple-hundred-million-dollar bond issue and a 0.1% sales tax increase would probably get us started.


Denver Launching Downtown Bike-Sharing Program

Adding a Downtown bike-sharing program isn’t one of the items on my Top 10 list (#7 coming soon), but it could be. As I learned today in Joel Warner’s blog post at Westword, this summer Denver will launch a bike sharing program similar to what we saw during the DNC last summer, which filled Denver’s Downtown streets with bicycles and, along with the mass of pedestrians, gave us a peek into Downtown Denver’s potential future where the automobile does not reign supreme. Known as B-Cycle, the program will bring 500 or so bikes to 30 bike stations scattered around Downtown. Read Joel’s blog for all the details.

What a great way to promote alternative transportation in Downtown and to give people another option for getting out of their cars! Along with our growing transit system and planned pedestrian and bike lane improvements, we’re slowing turning the ship from its 50-year course of giving the automobile priority in our built environment. More good news for Downtown Denver.


#8: Better Street Performers

Continuing our countdown of the Top 10 Ways to Make Downtown Denver Better… we need better street performers. Downtown Denver’s street performers seem to generally consist of a few people with legitimate musical talent, and many others who could be outplayed by a sixth grader.

I’m sure you’ve heard them many times: the solo musician squeaking and squawking on some instrument, struggling to play a seemingly simple, yet unrecognizable song consisting of nothing but quarter notes. I suppose these hard economic times drive some people to do things they normally wouldn’t do, like playing a musical instrument in public even though they’re not very good at it. I don’t fault them for trying, but when you hear a good musician playing out on the street, it can be an uplifting, engaging experience that contributes to the intrigue and appeal of the Downtown environment.

I’d like to see the city and/or the Partnership recruit, as they have done in the past, small performing groups and other talented musicians and artists to perform on Downtown’s streets and in Downtown’s parks and plazas. But instead of concentrating those efforts around the holidays or on key summer weekends, it would be nice to have them around on a regular basis throughout the year—sort of like a low-intensity, ongoing buskerfest. Such things create a casual but festive ambiance to Downtown’s streets and reinforce the fact that Downtown is not just anyplace, but a one-of-a-kind place in our city.

This topic of street performers reminds me of two experiences I had in the Portlands—Maine and Oregon—during business trips to those cities in 2007. In Portland, Maine, a small public square in the heart of Downtown was hosting a weekly farmer’s market. But hanging out nearby were these guys:

I don’t know if they were hired by the city or the market organizers, or if they were just opportunists, but they were good and they really made the setting and the experience memorable. Then in Portland, Oregon, I was walking through the shady, delightful North Park Blocks area in the Pearl District on a Saturday afternoon and spotted a man on a park bench unpacking a violin from its case. He started to play so I pulled up a patch of grass nearby and listened. He was exceptionally talented and proceeded through a number of intense classical pieces, all from memory. Over the course of an hour, a crowd of perhaps thirty people gathered around, enjoying the free concert. He wasn’t even asking for money. After he finished, I thanked him and inquired about his obvious talent. He said he plays professionally for an orchestra in North Carolina and was on vacation in Portland and just felt like practicing out in the park. I was glad he did.

Anyway, walking this afternoon from Civic Center back to LoDo after a meeting, I came across four different street performers along the 16th Street Mall. The first guy was singing and playing a guitar. He was OK. I’ve heard much worse. Then there was the ventriloquist. I hung around nearby for a few minutes, but he and his dummy never performed. I think he was waiting for a crowd to gather first, but no one stopped since he wasn’t doing anything. The third guy was playing the flute, and he was quite good and was really getting into it. The fourth act I came across was the best. It was a combo, one guy playing a banjo, the other guy playing a mandolin. They were very talented and sounded great together. I gave them a couple of bucks. So, today was a pretty good day for street performers on the Mall, I’m happy to report.

But some days are better than others. As Downtown Denver improves, so too will the quality of our street performers, I hope.