Skip to content
Archive of entries posted on January 2009

Denver Launching Downtown Bike-Sharing Program

Adding a Downtown bike-sharing program isn’t one of the items on my Top 10 list (#7 coming soon), but it could be. As I learned today in Joel Warner’s blog post at Westword, this summer Denver will launch a bike sharing program similar to what we saw during the DNC last summer, which filled Denver’s Downtown streets with bicycles and, along with the mass of pedestrians, gave us a peek into Downtown Denver’s potential future where the automobile does not reign supreme. Known as B-Cycle, the program will bring 500 or so bikes to 30 bike stations scattered around Downtown. Read Joel’s blog for all the details.

What a great way to promote alternative transportation in Downtown and to give people another option for getting out of their cars! Along with our growing transit system and planned pedestrian and bike lane improvements, we’re slowing turning the ship from its 50-year course of giving the automobile priority in our built environment. More good news for Downtown Denver.


#8: Better Street Performers

Continuing our countdown of the Top 10 Ways to Make Downtown Denver Better… we need better street performers. Downtown Denver’s street performers seem to generally consist of a few people with legitimate musical talent, and many others who could be outplayed by a sixth grader.

I’m sure you’ve heard them many times: the solo musician squeaking and squawking on some instrument, struggling to play a seemingly simple, yet unrecognizable song consisting of nothing but quarter notes. I suppose these hard economic times drive some people to do things they normally wouldn’t do, like playing a musical instrument in public even though they’re not very good at it. I don’t fault them for trying, but when you hear a good musician playing out on the street, it can be an uplifting, engaging experience that contributes to the intrigue and appeal of the Downtown environment.

I’d like to see the city and/or the Partnership recruit, as they have done in the past, small performing groups and other talented musicians and artists to perform on Downtown’s streets and in Downtown’s parks and plazas. But instead of concentrating those efforts around the holidays or on key summer weekends, it would be nice to have them around on a regular basis throughout the year—sort of like a low-intensity, ongoing buskerfest. Such things create a casual but festive ambiance to Downtown’s streets and reinforce the fact that Downtown is not just anyplace, but a one-of-a-kind place in our city.

This topic of street performers reminds me of two experiences I had in the Portlands—Maine and Oregon—during business trips to those cities in 2007. In Portland, Maine, a small public square in the heart of Downtown was hosting a weekly farmer’s market. But hanging out nearby were these guys:

I don’t know if they were hired by the city or the market organizers, or if they were just opportunists, but they were good and they really made the setting and the experience memorable. Then in Portland, Oregon, I was walking through the shady, delightful North Park Blocks area in the Pearl District on a Saturday afternoon and spotted a man on a park bench unpacking a violin from its case. He started to play so I pulled up a patch of grass nearby and listened. He was exceptionally talented and proceeded through a number of intense classical pieces, all from memory. Over the course of an hour, a crowd of perhaps thirty people gathered around, enjoying the free concert. He wasn’t even asking for money. After he finished, I thanked him and inquired about his obvious talent. He said he plays professionally for an orchestra in North Carolina and was on vacation in Portland and just felt like practicing out in the park. I was glad he did.

Anyway, walking this afternoon from Civic Center back to LoDo after a meeting, I came across four different street performers along the 16th Street Mall. The first guy was singing and playing a guitar. He was OK. I’ve heard much worse. Then there was the ventriloquist. I hung around nearby for a few minutes, but he and his dummy never performed. I think he was waiting for a crowd to gather first, but no one stopped since he wasn’t doing anything. The third guy was playing the flute, and he was quite good and was really getting into it. The fourth act I came across was the best. It was a combo, one guy playing a banjo, the other guy playing a mandolin. They were very talented and sounded great together. I gave them a couple of bucks. So, today was a pretty good day for street performers on the Mall, I’m happy to report.

But some days are better than others. As Downtown Denver improves, so too will the quality of our street performers, I hope.


Geller’s Bell Tower is Back!

We interrupt our Top 10 countdown for the following news flash: Buzz Geller’s Bell Tower is making a comeback!

John Rebchook has the scoop in today’s Rocky Mountain News. Here’s the article in PDF format. The tower has been thinned by 18% in response to the city’s and the Lower Downtown Design Review Board’s comments that the previous design wasn’t skinny enough.

Mr. Geller’s decision to put the tower on a diet and resubmit it was influenced, in part, by the positive and encouraging comments he received here at DenverInfill, particularly on this post which generated over 60 comments, including one from Mr. Geller himself. Good job everyone!

Getting the tower built will still be a challenge but, with a little luck, it will happen and become a new icon on the Denver skyline. I’ll be editing this post to add some high-resolution renderings of the tower’s new design later today.

AFTERNOON EDIT:
Here are two high-resolution images (courtesy of Fentress Architects and Buzz Geller, by way of John Rebchook) of Geller’s proposed 34-story tower in Downtown Denver. The image on the left compares the “before” and “after,” and the image on the right is the new narrower tower with the proposed low-rise office building and park across the creek.


#9: More Trees!

We need more trees in Downtown Denver. To explain, I’m going to quote myself from a blog I did in September 2007 about Portland, Oregon’s Downtown treescape:

“Trees. They are such a critical element in a downtown streetscape, given all the concrete, asphalt, brick, and other hard and heat-radiating surfaces found in urban centers. In Denver, our Downtown treescape is in poor shape. The trees along 16th Street are generally in good condition and have grown over the past 25 years to create a relatively nice canopy along the Mall. But venture down just about any other Downtown Denver street, and you’ll find plenty of frail specimens looking all battered and abused, jagged stumps poking up from the sidewalk like broken-off toothpicks, and empty tree grates harboring weeds. Given the ubiquitous sunshine in Denver and our increasingly scorching summers, we need all the Downtown trees we can get.”

We also need to take better care of our Downtown trees. It’s very discouraging to see trees that are dead or severely stressed, but still sitting in their tree grate on the sidewalk. That would be like leaving the carcass of a dead animal on the sidewalk until its body decomposes. We would never allow that, yet we allow dead or dying trees to remain in place for years. Except for the trees on the 16th Street Mall and in parks and a few other places, the maintenance of Downtown trees are the responsibility of the owner in front of whose property the tree sits. So the next time you’re Downtown and you spot a dead tree or an empty tree grate, look at the building you’re standing in front of, and you’ll know who to blame.

How many trees are there Downtown and how do we know it’s not enough, you might ask? John D. at the Downtown Denver Partnership did a partial tree survey this past summer, and he was kind enough to share the data with me. The survey focused on just the named streets, from Cleveland Place to Larimer Street, and the blocks between 14th and 18th Streets (the 1400, 1500, 1600, and 1700 blocks). Also, two assumptions: 8 is the desired minimum number of trees per block face (or 16 trees per block), and the named streets run north-south. Using his raw data, I’ve created the following table:

What does this information tell us? Here are some key conclusions:

  • Based on the minimum standard of 8 trees per block face, the survey area in total has only about 56% of the street trees that it should have.

  • Collectively, the 1700 blocks are the best off, with about 73% of the trees they should have, followed by the 1500 blocks with 58%, the 1400 blocks with 50%, and the 1600 blocks with only 43%.

  • Curtis Street is the best off, with about 84% of the trees it should have, followed by California (76%), Larimer (72%), Arapahoe (62%), Stout (58%), Lawrence (55%) and Cleveland (50%). Having less than half the desired number of trees is Welton (44%), Tremont (41%), Court (39%), Champa (36%), and finally Glenarm, with only 30% of the minimum number of street trees.

  • Of the 88 total block faces in the study group, 27 of them (31%) were at or greater than the desired minimum. Of the remaining 61 block faces with some kind of shortfall (anywhere from 1 to 8 trees) about one-third (22) had a shortfall of 1 to 4 trees, and about two-thirds (39) had a shortfall of 5 to 8 trees.

  • A total of 26 block faces (30% of the entire survey group) don’t have a single street tree!

Keep in mind that this survey did not take into consideration the quality (i.e. health) of a tree, only if a tree was present. In fact, a few of the trees counted were noted as being dead, but were counted nevertheless.

Planting more trees is one goal, keeping every tree in a vibrant state of health is another. Our current system of relying on property owners to maintain the street trees in front of their property is obviously not working very well. We need to either vigorously enforce the current requirements, or make the maintenance of all trees in the Central Business District the responsibility of some entity that can ensure the trees are irrigated, pruned, and cared for on a regular basis. One way or another, we need a Downtown treescape that provides ample shade, shelter, and aesthetics for the pedestrian.


#10: Downtown Public Recycling Program

Denver has had residential curbside recycling for more than ten years now and, from what I’ve heard, it’s a pretty good program. The problem is, it’s only for single-family households and multi-family buildings of seven units or less. Multi-family buildings with eight units or more and commercial/office buildings… too bad!

Since Downtown Denver represents the greatest concentration of high-density residential and commercial uses in the city, one can assume that Downtown Denver probably generates more recyclable trash than anywhere else in the city. It doesn’t make any sense then, that the one place in our city with the greatest volume of recyclables is essentially excluded from our public recycling program. Public, as in your tax dollars pay for the program but you don’t get the service if you live in a condo building. (Same thing applies to regular trash pickup too.)

Of course, many people who live and work in the Downtown area do recycle, but doing so must be arranged through a private waste collection company, and you have to pay for the privilege. Since we’re trying to encourage higher-density living in Denver as part of being a more sustainable city, shouldn’t we be providing incentives (like, you know, free recycling) to residents living in multi-family buildings? In fact, maybe what we should do is make Denver residents who live in single-family homes arrange for private trash collection at their own expense (which is the case in many cities) but provide free municipal trash and recycling collection to residents who live in multi-family buildings. Wouldn’t that represent a more efficient use of our city tax dollars and a policy more consistent with our city’s sustainability goals?

There is some good news, however. In April 2008, the city launched a pilot program for municipal recycling collection in selected multi-family residential buildings in the Capitol Hill district. Let’s hope the program becomes permanent and is expanded to other areas in the urban core. Also, the Downtown Denver Partnership and the city recently launched a “single-stream” recycling program for the 16th Street Mall. Hopefully, that will be expanded one day throughout all of Downtown Denver.

Anyway, maximizing recycling in the region’s most densely populated urban place just makes sense and is the right and fair thing for the city to do. What do you think?


The Top 10 List

The other day I had the opportunity to present a personal “Top 10″ list at the Museum of Contemporary Art. It was a very cool experience. Thank you to Alison and everyone else at the Museum for taking good care of me, and thank you to the good group of people who attended and for the lively conversation that ensued. By the way, if you have never been to the rooftop cafe at the museum, you need to go. What an awesome space!

Anyway, because you asked, I’m going to reveal my “Top 10 Ways to Make Downtown Denver Better” here on the blog, along with some commentary on each item. Keep in mind, the list was not the result of an academic treatise or a comprehensive needs analysis on my part. It was, you know, something I just whipped up, so don’t get too hung up on what didn’t make the list or what order they’re in. Just have fun debating the issues!

On with the list starting in the next post….