DenverInfill: A 2012 Retrospective

It’s that time of year again! Let’s take a look back at 2012 and reflect upon our accomplishments during the year in making Denver’s urban core the best it can be. For our previous retrospectives, use the link under the Pages section on the right side bar.

The big story in 2012 had to be the magnitude of the multifamily residential construction boom that developed during the year in the Downtown area. I recently posted an extensive overview of this issue in late November, so I won’t repeat all those details here. But the bottom line is that there are over 3,700 residential units within the greater Downtown Denver area under construction right now—and that is profound for two reasons:

First, it was only two years ago in my 2010 Retrospective that I wrote, “Well, what can I say that everyone doesn’t already know: the economy tanked, the boom is over, and we’re in a period of ‘transition’ (that’s a nice way of saying there’s not going to be a lot of private-sector real estate development in the next few years).” Then, just one year later in my 2011 Retrospective, I observed, “We’re on the cusp of a MAJOR housing boom in central Denver… I’ll wait until our 2012 Retrospective to say that the ‘Boom is Back,’ but this is a heads-up that it may be.”

OK, let’s say it: The boom is back!

The intensity with which private-sector investment in central Denver came roaring back in 2012 was amazing. Strong population growth and the lowest apartment rental vacancy rates in a decade will do that for you. But this current residential boom is more than just a function of market supply and demand. It’s reflective of something much bigger, which brings me to the second reason why this construction boom is so profound: it dramatically reflects the reality of the suburbs-to-city cultural and demographic shifts taking place across the United States, and the strong appeal of Denver’s urban core in particular.

Let’s take a look at US Census Bureau data of authorized building permits for privately-owned residential units (i.e. no public housing) for the Denver-Aurora-Broomfield Metropolitan Statistical Area, year-to-date, through November 2012 (the most recent month available as of this posting date). I created the table below using metropolitan-level data from here and county-specific data from here. (Note: the Denver-Aurora-Broomfield MSA does not include Boulder County.)

What are the key points we should take from this table?

  • Almost half (43%) of all permitted residential units in the metro area were in Denver County.
  • Almost two-thirds (61%) of permitted residential units in 5+ Unit multifamily buildings were in Denver County.
  • Within Denver County, four out of five residential building permits were located within a multifamily 5+ Unit building.
  • While some of the roughly 3,700 residential units under construction in the Downtown area were probably issued permits in 2011, most were likely issued in 2012, which means that somewhere around one-third to one-half of all multifamily residential units authorized in 2012 in the entire Denver-Aurora-Broomfield metro area were located within the greater Downtown Denver area.

Twenty years ago, in 1992, Denver County had a total of 506 residential units (of all kinds) authorized, out of a metro total of around 11,000, or about 5% of the metro total. That’s an order of magnitude difference in twenty years. Profound change, indeed.

Downtown-area housing was not the only big news in 2012. Public-sector development continued full-steam ahead. Two big state projects reached completion (the Ralph Carr Colorado Judicial Center and History Colorado Center) as well as two state educational projects on the Auraria Campus were also completed in 2012 (Metro State’s Hotel & Hospitality Learning Center and Metro State’s Student Success Building). The City of Denver finished construction on the Denver Police Crime Lab, as well as the Clyfford Still Museum—a major addition to the city’s cultural scene. The federal government completed a major renovation of the Cesar Chavez Building (plus a new parking garage), and RTD brought construction of the 12-mile long West Line to almost the completion point. Just over three months to go before the West line opens! Major construction also began on the East Line to DIA, the Gold Line to Arvada and Wheat Ridge, and the half-billion-dollar expansion of the terminal at Denver International Airport (with RTD transit center) also started in 2012.

And then there’s that public-sector project that involves the state, the feds, the city, RTD, and the private sector too: Denver Union Station. The project began 2012 with the new light rail station open, half of the underground bus terminal constructed, and a big hole in the ground for the second half of the bus terminal. During 2012, Light Rail Plaza was completed and opened to the public, the reconstruction of 16th Street and Wewatta Street was mostly finished, the second-half of the underground bus terminal was capped and the commuter rail platforms set in place, the 17th Street Garden Plaza was completed (but not yet open) and serious work began on Wynkoop Plaza. One of the most visible aspect of the Union Station project also started taking shape in 2012: the dramatic canopy structure over the commuter rail platforms. Major construction began in 2012 on both the North and South Wing Buildings and Denver Union Station itself closed in late 2012 as it begins its restoration and transformation into a modern/historic transit center with plenty of retail and restaurants and a boutique hotel. Finally, in 2012, I conducted 17 of our DenverInfill walking tours of the Union Station project. Over 500 people attended the tours and we raised over $2,000 in donations for Union Station Advocates and for the students studying in the Master of Urban and Regional Planning program at the University of Colorado Denver. Thank you!!

Downtown investment wasn’t limited to residential and public buildings. In 2012 we started to see activity in the office and hotel sectors as well. In addition to the two new “wing” office buildings at Union Station starting construction, the DaVita headquarters opened in 2012, site work started late in the year on 16M (the mixed-use office/residential building at the corner of 16th & Market), and several new office buildings were proposed in the Union Station area. In addition to the new hotel at Union Station, two additional existing buildings (the Colorado National Bank and Xcel Energy buildings) also continued their conversion into new hotels. More good news for the Downtown office market in 2012: the new United States Patent Office will be located in Downtown Denver!

Finally, 2012 was a good year for DenverInfill and DenverUrbanism. Ryan Dravitz gave his camera a serious workout with a steady stream of construction update posts throughout the year, Ryan Mulligan continued his ongoing series of posts about West Line construction and other RTD news, and we launched a new series about East Line construction thanks to our new contributing blogger, Robert Wilson. I completed a 15-part DenverUrbanism series on Denver’s Single-Family Homes by Decade (which darn near took the whole year for me to finish!) and the rest of our DenverInfill and DenverUrbanism blogging crew (Derek, Dan, Shawn, John, and Rick) contributed great content as always. During the year, almost 600,000 people visited the DenverInfill/DenverUrbanism blogs or the original DenverInfill website.

To conclude: 2012 turned out to be a great year for Denver. More and more people are moving into the Downtown area, more investment dollars are flowing into the city center, and Denver citizens remain committed to improving our city. Hopefully, 2013 will be a year where these trends continue.

By | 2016-12-18T06:24:23+00:00 January 14, 2013|Categories: Denver Neighborhoods, Downtown Districts, Economic Growth, History, Urbanism|8 Comments


  1. Ryan January 15, 2013 at 7:08 am

    Ken – are you going to update the denverinfill website or is that a retrospective view of what used to be? Either way, thanks for these websites!!

  2. Ginty January 15, 2013 at 9:37 am

    I love the site, I might be 1,000 of those 600,000 visits. I was wondering if you’d comment on Sun Valley and the TOD around the Federal blvd stop for the West line. It was just outside your 1.5 mile radius for your housing boom post. I found some stuff at (I think) and it looked interesting. The plan mentioned development in a new SoCo (I know you hate the shortening), South Colfax, park redevelopment, retail and housing. It just seems like that area could be a great neighborhood.

    • Ginty January 16, 2013 at 12:28 pm

      Sorry it’s not South Colfax it’s Lower Colfax (LoCo).

  3. Austin January 15, 2013 at 10:25 am

    Great work on the statistics, Ken. Your comparison of 2012 residential building trends to 1992 was the highlight for me. It’s truly impressive how the pendulum of investment has swung back toward our center city.

  4. Eric January 16, 2013 at 9:42 am

    A correction – The Clyfford Still Museum was completed, and opened, in November 2011.

    Thanks for the efforts to keep us updated.

  5. Dan January 16, 2013 at 2:17 pm

    Love the site Ken and love having more residents in and around downtown, I look forward to the amenities that will follow. It will be so great for downtown if the City Target gets built at 15th and California.

    I find it interesting that seemingly every week or so there is an announcement of another company bringing X hundred jobs to the Denver area, and yet they all seem to be in Douglas County, Aurora, Broomfield, etc… Are we headed for reverse suburbia where people live in an urban environment and commute outward to their employer? I realize the land is very expensive, but can you imagine how great it would be if just a few of these companies were bringing the jobs to downtown Denver? Other than the patent office I can’t think of anything of signifance being announced in 2012. We can only hope for a few more Davitas in the coming years.

    • SC48 January 17, 2013 at 10:56 am

      So true, was thinking the exact same thing myself! Two things that I see as hopeful signs for more companies locating downtown in the future:

      One, if the job market continues to improve through 2013, employers will increasingly have to compete for talent, whereas now, seems like its still very much an employers’ market. If/when competition for employees becomes more intense, I think a downtown location will be a strong selling point – and not just for people living downtown, but also because it’s central. A company located in Douglas County is going to have trouble luring talent from the 36 corridor, and vice-versa. If the market flips, more employers will view the added cost of a downtown location as an investment rather than an expense.

      Two, as boomers start to retire in greater numbers, the jobs in Douglas County are going to be close to fewer and fewer employees. Although there are plenty of younger people living out there, as a percentage, it seems to be much lower. As evidenced from the current boom downtown, the younger generations have voted for downtown living. However, the City also needs to do a better job of getting family friendly housing built in and around downtown – 600 sq. ft. studios don’t help matters any. Hyper-paranoia and NIMBY-ism surrounding highrises in this city isn’t a very encouraging sign.

      Just my two cents…

      • Jim Nash January 24, 2013 at 12:37 am

        Hey, SC48, back in the late 60’s, we used to see a bumper sticker around: “Don’t Californicate Colorado.” The NIMBYS still rule here. I’m retiring in this beautiful city — but I don’t delude myself about the provincial fear of high density and high rises in Denver. It’s relfected in the down-zoning to mid-rise of the entire infill donut around the downtown. The whole city has been view-planed into mediocrity. Put a lid on density and you de-value the land. Planners have totally caved to the NIMBY demographic — which votes, but does not represent the young urbans who want to live in a real downtown, in a real city, that’s packed and congested and interesting. Zoning in Denver has always been used as a weapon against growth. Will Arapahoe Square, right next to the CBD, have any buildings over 30 stories? On the Denver Planning Office website, you can see sketches of an “alternative” re-design of North Broadway — which is straddled by Arapahoe Square — as a closed-off “park street!” Some really Big City thinking going on there, at taxpayers’ expense.

        Look, I love Denver, and I think it’s wonderful, what Ken is doing with this website, to promote a more urban scene downtown. But why not fight for some random point towers and highrise crossroads, which make a city interesting? Thousands of people are moving downtown, but mostly into big flat 5-story boxes. And sidewalks running past blocks of these big boxes don’t have the kind of pedestrian crowds that you see in Chicago, San Francisco, Philadelphia or Seattle. Walk around Downtown after the work day, and it feels pretty deserted. High rises generate more street life, and more street-level retail. But so many influential Denverites have drunk the down-zoning coolaid, there’s no collective vision of the Mile High City as an actual big city.

        Ken, you’re selling a vision of Denver with a Parisian density, which is also served by subways, because there’s so little room left for cars in Paris. The higher you build, the more parking spaces you have to stack up, or bury under the building, but it allows more people to occupy the same block. Subways are out of the question in Denver, so why not make the city more family friendly, by making it more car friendly?

        If couples raising families can’t find the shopping and schools they want, they won’t move downtown. Why not fight for more pocket parks, next to tall buildings, next to everything from day care to high schools? Seems like down-zoning discourages higher income, older people from finding the urban life of big cities like Chicago, San Fran — oh well, you can’t fight city hall, Ken, so let’s pretend that mid-rise will produce the same urban environment as high rise.

        …and my two cents, SC48.

Comments are closed.